I’ve been thinking a lot recently how different styles of phrasing prompts can results in such drastically different outputs. While humans have all kinds of surrounding context cues, LLMs have to infer as much as possible from their single context. Some thing which come to mind are:
- Previous experiences, out of scope from direct memory. Perhaps things a person has learned about you through others.
- Facial expressions
- Role/relationship to other party.
Memory is definitely a component here but things like body language & tone seem to hold much semantic meaning, and isn’t easily conveyed via text or even voice. (These semantics can’t be conveyed by tone, or expression alone but rather a combination human cues at our “inference time”
What do you guys think about this? Anyone doing interesting work here?
p.s. this post is mostly for testing psyche forums. sorry mods if this is wrong place for this